SEARCH  

NEWS

2010.10.06:11:36:28
Autentika i Divante łączą siły
Agencja interaktywna Autentika oraz firma Divante, specjalizująca się w dziedzinie e-commerce, postanowiły połączyć swoje siły i nawiązać współpracę, której celem jest poszerzenie oferty obu firm o dodatkowe kompetencje i możliwość obsługi złożonych projektów.

 

153626234294_588460007488Russell King ARM Li
Hi Russell Thanks for your reply, Pls find the code attached regards.. Prafulla . . -----Original Message----- From: Russell King - ARM Linux [ rel="nofollow" mailto:linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mail

 
193726584592_517860007179Prafulla WADASKAR
On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 17:50:10 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 09:27:23AM +0530, Prafulla WADASKAR wrote: input_unregister_device(kp- inp_dev); /* if this

 
148826414283_582360007813Guennadi Liakhovetsk
Hi Russell thanks for your inputs and reviews the kernel page fault problem on re-insertion a module is solved by removing input_free_device after unregister. Now I am facing anther problem, when I

 
138327514023_562060007123Robbie
Hi all, I am using omap5912 board. I want to map the SDRAM to DSP. How to do this in linux. Thanks in advance regards Prabha J. Tata Consultancy Services Limited Mailto: prabha.j@xxxxxxx Website:

 
175221714543_550660007684James Steward

 
180622154307_510060007285Bart Jonkers
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 09:33 -0500, Robbie wrote: The three threads are essentially three loops performing various tasks. For all Im read I havent seen where in a RR policy a process must block or

 
158920344944_518060007420Bart Jonkers

 
136027014061_564360007684MarcAndrxE9 HxE9bert
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 10:51:50AM +0200, Bart Jonkers wrote: On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 10:02 -0800, tmike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Quoting Bart Jonkers <jonkersbart@xxxxxxxxx : Have you loo

 
145629074435_547960007652MarcAndrxE9 HxE9bert

 
160322784824_514560007502MarcAndre Hebert
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 10:25:43AM -0500, Marc-Andr? H?bert wrote: -----Message dorigine----- De : Andy Gatward [ rel="nofollow" mailto:agatward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:agatward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

 
183025904718_513660007816MarcAndre Hebert
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 01:05:58PM -0500, Marc-Andre Hebert wrote: Just tried that and its pumping a series of these, heres the first one I get (I can send the next ones if it helps): Id assume

 
142222784851_536660007063MarcAndre Hebert
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Marc-Andre Hebert wrote: De : Russell King - ARM Linux [ rel="nofollow" mailto:linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ] Looks like userspace has jumped

 
178628184765_584760007288MarcAndre Hebert
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Marc-Andre Hebert wrote: De : Nicolas Pitre [ rel="nofollow" mailto:nico@xxxxxxx mailto:nico@xxxxxxx ] 000b4a70 <__libc_malloc : b4a70: e92d407

 
153029174195_596660007722MarcAndre Hebert
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Marc-Andre Hebert wrote: De : Nicolas Pitre [ rel="nofollow" mailto:nico@xxxxxxx mailto:nico@xxxxxxx ] You could try adding cachepolicy=writethrough to your kernel c

 
161829985000_544160007783MarcAndre Hebert
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Marc-Andre Hebert wrote: De : Nicolas Pitre [ rel="nofollow" mailto:nico@xxxxxxx mailto:nico@xxxxxxx ] This means you are running your test program from either an ID

 
194429734372_566160007061Nicolas Pitre
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Marc-Andre Hebert wrote: I know the ext2 fs doesnt make much sense for us, it was kept like that mostly because that how it was. Your truly knows that JFFS didnt exist at t

 
147625324340_532760007798Pavel Pisa
-----Message dorigine----- De : Nicolas Pitre [ rel="nofollow" mailto:nico@xxxxxxx mailto:nico@xxxxxxx ] Envoye : 23 mars 2006 23:09 A : Marc-Andre Hebert Cc : Russell King - ARM Linux;

 
139126844615_515560007075Russell King ARM Li
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Pavel Pisa wrote: does that mean, that this patch is required for all platforms, where the MTD reads are used on non coherent cache systems (ARM)? If so, is it expected to

 
144420604992_563960007387Russell King ARM Li
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: However, theres a recent twist to this - the struct page in the scatter list may not refer to the page being transferred - annoyingly, offset

 
136126444385_536060007528James Steward
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 12:36 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: 2) and so far only for the mtdblock interface. Please excuse my ignorance, but isnt PCMCIA to Compact Flash a candidate? Its PIO isnt it?

 
114320274501_551560007611James Steward
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 09:13 +1000, James Steward wrote: On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 06:46 +1000, James Steward wrote: On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 12:36 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: 2) and so far

 
157721644142_591760007039James Steward
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:10:32AM +1000, James Steward wrote: More fuel for the fire, I have a couple of shell scripts that run from cron that suddenly threw me these 2 gems... Pid: 1854, c

 
171528834724_532960007253Russell King ARM Li
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 09:45 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:10:32AM +1000, James Steward wrote: More fuel for the fire, I have a couple of shell scripts that r

 
140524824314_539760007340Russell King ARM Li
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 08:53 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 02:05:15PM +1000, James Steward wrote: Does this agree with your theory of a bad SoC? Its differ

 
178424824985_516960007068Guennadi Liakhovetsk
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 14:42 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 12:07:04PM +1000, James Steward wrote: Well that was an interesting test... Ive attached the first

 
169729864096_519860007784James Steward
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:08:17AM +1000, James Steward wrote: Ive now hacked in a linear feedback shift register as you suggested and in doing that has made the ramtest more explosive on the sys

 
180920784949_595160007440James Steward

 
199127104323_571460007361James Steward

 
196824444844_528260007965Peter Pearse
"Jason Chang" <jchang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: This is technical referece manual doc. I mean the programming source or sample code. There might be some examples or some test programs

 
162326264447_560760007289Message not availabl
Hi all, FYI, the attached patch (to the debian sarge gcc-3.3 package) stops binaries generated by gcj-3.3 from segfaulting at startup on 2.6 arm kernels. The underlying issue is one in libgc that h

 
167524924274_577160007776jack chen
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 07:35:38AM -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote: Since gcc 3.3 is no longer maintained, and debian sid doesnt ship gcj-3.3 anymore, its not much use submitting bugs with either th

 
155524994854_550460007849Peter Menzebach
Peter wrote: jack chen wrote: Hi all : How can i change a ramdisk that have been processed by U-boot tools "mkimage" ? It seems that if d

 
194424404558_526760007597Alan Casey
Hi ALL: I always set the parameter with following line : setenv bootargs root=/dev/ram rw initrd=0x21100000,6000000 ramdisk_size=15360 ... I know what they mean EXCEPT the

 
162821224041_547160007884Bennett SH Wai
Hi, I want to know how process scheduling would happen in arm based system running linux 2.4.21 kernel, specific to this example of mine. Consider there is a processes which in a loop does only sta

 
143620274509_588360007303x412x438x442x430x43B
Le Vendredi 28 Octobre 2005 08:58, Bennett SH Wai a écrit : I find AT91.com has changed that no Linux info is given now. Does anyone know if 2.6.?? available for AT91RM9200? From where

 
117223094796_544760007486Sushant Kumar Mishra

 
122226364986_507560007435jinzhcheng
hi, I am trying to use use 2.6.13.4 kernel version for my at91rm9200dk board.In that i have no support for ethernet RMII. The MII vs RMII selection is done via the is_rmii field of the at91_e

 
192420834876_548260007030Project TraineesEmbe
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 01:25:32PM +0000, jinzhcheng wrote: Please read rel="nofollow" www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php#e2 www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php#e2

 
107829794152_512060007557Pramod P K
Hello! I want to porting Intel VFM fs to my arm board(running linux-2.4.20), maybe somebody has do it? 在 2005-10-27四的 19:04 +0800,linux-arm-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 
100328854584_551360007218Sushant Kumar Mishra
It seems the latest version of strace is not working properly with 2.6.14. Below is a patch that fixes the problem. rel="nofollow" www.fluff.org/ben/patches/strace/strace-fix-arm-bad-syscall.p

 
181629404528_561260007608Sushant Kumar Mishra

 
109826094244_508360007383Michael Opdenacker
arm-linux-gcc 2.95.3 is too old. There are major changes, so its better to get the latest toolchain.

 
151926084467_539460007818Sushant Kumar Mishra
Does the micro have a MMU or not? Hi, I want the 3.3.2 cross tool chain for arm. From where i can download them. regards skm ________________________________________________

 
142421684796_557760007244Mathieu Deschamps
Hi, Im trying to mount USB pendrive as described at rel="nofollow" oskfordummies.hp.infoseek.co.jp/howto/usbflash.html oskfordummies.hp.infoseek.co.jp/howto/usbflash.html but my linux HA

 
113322924129_571860007897Pramod P K

 
193726214837_546460007223Aras Vaichas

 
107223314833_531660007517Russell King ARM Li

 
170029334124_516760007214Rodger Wilson
I looked at online document and found there are low-latency patch and preemption patch for 2.4 kernel. Does anyone know if these patch are already part of 2.6.13 kernel? Does anyone actually try to m

 
198527524382_578060007671Geoff Levand
Rodger, There was a brief discussion in Oprofile mail list regarding cross-compile that might help you. rel="nofollow" marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=oprofile-list&m=112967045229538&w=2 mar

 
102424624964_515460007768Russell King ARM Li
Hi All, I am trying to figure where in the system.(arm based board, no swap etc, all in memory, applications jffs2 based mounted partitions) Its happening only when I am running in a specific mode a